October 16 – A Palace Burns

nPosted October 16, 2017

Key points

nI never really think of this building as a palace. I think of it as Westminster, or as the United Kingdom’s Parliament.

nParliament, as you probably know, is the lawmaking body of the United Kingdom. Made up of the House of Commons and the House of Lords, it is similar in some ways to the United States’ Congress.

nOf course, the U.K. has royalty, unlike the U.S., and when you think of kings and queens, you think of palaces. Back when it was first created, in the 11th Century, Westminster Palace was the main residence of England’s kings and queens. Even now, the Parliament building is “owned” by Queen Elizabeth II, and it’s still formally considered a royal residence – even though it isn’t used that way.

nAs with most other very old buildings, Westminster has been damaged and even partially destroyed in its long past. Much of it was destroyed by a fire in 1512. But on this date in 1834, an even worse fire destroyed almost all of the original medieval portions!

The roof of Westminster Hall remained
intact, although the cloisters were badly
damaged.

nThe only original structures to survive were Westminster Hall, the Chapel of St. Mary Undercroft, the Cloisters (covered walk) of St. Stephen, and the Jewel Tower.

nHere’s how it went down:

nBack in the 1800s, England had an accountant sort of person called the Exchequer. He would keep track of the collection of taxes using split tally sticks. These were cut in half lengthwise with a series of notches to stand for monies owed or paid. After the stick was cut, one portion was given to the taxpayer (say, a farmer), and the other portion was kept by the Exchequer.

nIt was tamper proof. There are always natural irregularities in wood and in the cut surfaces of the tallies – and so they would only fit back together perfectly if the correct halves were used. Nobody could pretend that he or she had paid more by cutting more notches – because the other half would remain as proof of the tampering.

nCharles Dickens wrote about how tally sticks were notched:

nThe manner of cutting is as follows. At the top of the tally a cut is made, the thickness of the palm of the hand, to represent a thousand pounds; then a hundred pounds by a cut the breadth of a thumb; twenty pounds, the breadth of the little finger; a single pound, the width of a swollen barleycorn; a shilling rather narrower; then a penny is marked by a single cut without removing any wood.

nBasically, the tally sticks became a sort of currency (money).

After using tally sticks for about 700 years (!), the tally stick system fell out of use in 1826. In October of 1834, the Clerk of Works was ordered to destroy the stockpile of tally sticks while Parliament was not in session. So he decided to destroy them by burning them.

nBut the Clerk used the two heating furnaces in the cellar below the House of Lords. And those furnaces were designed to burn coal, not wood. And wood burns with a higher flame!

nApparently the Clerk tried to be careful. He had two workers burning the wood with the furnace doors open, so they could keep their eyes on the flames. However, the heat from the flames had melted the copper lining of the chimneys, and the chimney fires that resulted could not be seen.

nThe burning of the tally sticks had begun at dawn. By 4:00 p.m., there was a strong smell of burning in the House of the Lords. But, remember, Parliament was not in session. Some tourists felt some heat from the floor, and smelled the smoke, but apparently they did not realize that anything was actually wrong. (At the time, flames and heat and smoke were probably more common inside buildings – in furnaces and fireplaces – than nowadays.)

nIn the meantime, the workers who had labored all day to burn the sticks finally finished shortly after 4:00 p.m., closed the furnace doors, and left the cellars and the building.

nAt 6:00 p.m., the wife of the doorkeeper saw flames and raised the alarm among the House of Lords staff. For about half an hour, the staff tried to fight the fire without calling for outside assistance – and also without alerting the staff at the House of Commons.

nAt 6:30, a giant ball of flame that was seen by the royal family 20 miles away in Windsor Castle! – and pretty much all of London, of course. Parish men with two hand-pump engines joined the battle against the fire, and 100 soldiers arrive to help fight the blaze and also to control the crowd.

nA London fire fighting organization run by insurance companies (apparently there was no public fire fighters at this time) were finally alerted at 7:00 p.m., and they 64 fire fighters used 12 engines, hoses, and water from the nearby Thames River to fight the fire. Note that they did this even though the Palace complex was NOT insured!

nPeople then could act just as stupidly as people now – and apparently so many people gathered around to watch their Parliament go up in flames that Westminster Bridge was jammed, many people clustered near the fire on the river, using whatever boat they owned or could hire, and thousands of people watched from nearby Parliament Square. I imagine that having such big crowds to deal with made the fire fighters’ job even harder.

nThank goodness, even with all the gawking crowds, there were no deaths from the fire!