William Monahan made a name for himself as a screenwriter with the likes of Kingdom of Heaven (2005) and The Departed(2006), suggesting an expansive intelligence and gifts for conflicted characters and pungent dialogue. But they also reflected a
Colin Farrell gives another of his customarily excellent performances as Mitchell, a former stand-over man just out of prison. His first act in getting out proves to be an original sin he canโt ever recover from: he accepts the help of his featherheaded low-life debt collector mate Billy (Ben Chaplin), who works for underground titan Gant (Ray Winstone). Billy stashes Mitchell away in a flat that belongs to a doctor who fell afoul of Gant and had to give up his worldly possessions to him. Mitchellโs intrinsically protective attitude, so potent itโs practically self-destructive, as displayed towards women and old pals, is based in unstated familial traumas and his perpetual worry for his damaged, flighty prostitute sister Briony (Anna Friel). This instinctual quality begins to dictate his future even in his first hours of freedom. Outside a nightclub, he sees off two likely lads about to harass Penny (Ophelia Lovibond), who, impressed by his mettle, recommends him for the job of bodyguard to Charlotte (Keira Knightley), or โOur Charโ as she referred to on the tabloid pages that report her crises with vampiric รฉlan. An ubiquitous movie star and fashion icon,
is an interesting failure that declines steadily from an excellent first act to an underwhelming last phase, suggesting a crisis of confidence and focus on Monahanโs part. He carefully weaves a number of potentially gripping motifs, in the clash of high and low life, the surreally disparate yet equally potent versions of fame and fortune exemplified by Gant and Char, as well as the variations of entrapment experienced by the actress and Mitchell. Bridge for the two worlds is Charโs perpetually stoned houseguest and guardian angel Jordan (David Thewlis), who adapts readily when necessity demands from louche intellectual immigrant, reminiscent of a caterpillar in his shaggy shrugging indolence, to assassin by simply by adapting his actorโs creed โ โI am what I say I amโ โ and a call to arms from Mitchell. Monahan populates the vibrant background โ perhaps too vibrant โ with oddball characters like Sanjeev Bhaskar as Raju, a likeable but repressed doctor who attends to the dying Joe and who falls under Brionyโs spell, and Eddie Marsan as the corrupt yet utterly spineless top cop Bailey. Chaplin is very good playing that most interminable of modern gangster movie figures, the hapless and pathetic friend who tries to be a player but drags everyone down. The soundtrack bristles with tracks by the likes of Dylan, The Rolling Stones, The Yardbirds and Electric Banana, borrowing their swagger for initially compelling affectations of mod cool and pop-art-inflected Greek choral commentary, and occasional moments in the film, as when Jordan loans Mitchell one of Charโs vintage Rolls Royces to ride off to gangland warfare in, that do suggest a mischievous sense of humour.
Mitchell makes for an engaging anti-hero, a man of scruples and humanity who is nonetheless ready and able to use stunning violence to defend his turf, a refusal to bend or retreat or cower that will ultimately destroy everything he sets out to protect. Farrell handles his mixture of confidence in physical confrontations and ever so slight dazedness in the face of paparazzi and the metastasising strangeness of modern life, as well as his simmering sense of protectiveness towards his loved-ones, with sublime confidence. Likewise his scenes with Winstone are riveting for the divergent versions of Alpha Male force they invoke, especially when, after Gant has shot the black hostage, the pairโs mutual fury rises in a squall, bellowing in each otherโs faces like dogs arguing territory, confirming, as later dialogue states unnecessarily, that Mitchell is not only not afraid of Gant, but that if he builds up a head of steam he would prove an engine of murderous destruction. Only his lingering morals and human ties keep him from doing so, and Farrell expertly evokes the twinges of those scruples, like fishhooks in his skin, tugging at him as circumstances demand brutal action. One particularly good scene presents the spectacle of Mitchell trying to get his bedevilled and wilfully fuzzy-headed sister to flee town long enough for him to take out Gant without worrying about her: the schism between his concern and her mixture of affection and contempt is a penetrating momentary portrait of dysfunction and solicitude failing to comprehend each-other.
lacks the ruthless deterministic quality of Hodgesโ Iโll Sleep When Iโm Dead (2004) in portraying a former heavy whose desire to stay straight is eroded by a sense of duty and justice as well as ingrained warrior reflexes. But
constantly suggests larger and stranger things on its mind. In presenting a collision of the underworldโs capacity for brute and showy force meeting the equally showy and perhaps equally corrosive perversions of show business, it threatens to careen deep into irrational romanticism and meta-theatre ironies, a la Performance (1970), another apparent influence, or perhaps a gaudy pop-art eruption along the lines of Seijun Suzuki. But Monahan proves unequal to that challenge. Instead, he finally takes refuge in modern gangster movie standbys, from Gantโs scarily discursive conversational gambits, to the last-minute twist, evoking the likes of Layer Cake(2004) and The Departed where a near-forgotten supporting character returns to ice the anti-hero right at the point of victory. The central romance between Mitchell and Char never seems as vital or sexily transgressive as it should be. Charโs most substantial moment comes in meditating on the essential uses of actresses in mainstream films, in a wry, acutely accurate scene: it would ring truer if Char didnโt end up so peripheral to the main story, and therefore exactly the sort of feminine sounding board Monahanโs making fun of. Knightleyโs performance is aptly fidgety and brittle, the familiar planes of her face drawn taut in nervous exhaustion and eyes pools of suggested internal damage just as descriptive as the Francis Bacon paintings on her walls. Whilst Char never quite seems to find her place in the movie, nonetheless Monahan seems to be working from some reservoir of experience in his portrait of her and the world she represents, with its supposedly classy yet often sleazy and abusive vicissitudes. In another telling vignette, Char goes shopping, attempting to retain anonymity in a boutique where her physiognomy is affixed throughout, and her self-consciousness is crucifying. Whereas Sofia Coppolaโs Somewhere (2010) depicted a movie star in crisis fleeing the Chateau Marmont, here itโs the last refuge for Char, a mordant reversal in a portrait of fame as a cage where not only is normality out of reach, but so is a common right to justice.
Monahanโs dialogue also often retains a knowing zing, as when Jordan explains to Mitchell, whose incarceration means that heโs not up to speed on the pop cultural moment, that, referring to Charlotteโs acting career, โIf it wasnโt for Monica Bellucci, sheโd be the most-raped woman in European cinema,โ a line that hits several targets at once. Monahan clearly tries to channel his better models and former collaborators in creating his cinematic surfaces, including an early Scorsese shout-out as Mitchellโs first heroic return to an underworld night spot is scored to the Stones a la De Niroโs Mean Streetsentrance, substituting โStray Cat Bluesโ for โJumping Jack Flashโ. But finally Monahanโs lack of experience begins to show as the film collapses under its own weight, and his attempts to leave the edges rough give way to a rushed, non-sequitir fragmentation. The last half-hour, like The Departed, dissolves into a rather bewildering and desultory corpse pile-up, and whilst the stranger, better ideas continue to bob up, like Jordan travelling so deeply within his role he finally becomes a desperado himself, they fail to cohere with moral weight or tragi-comic pep. Chris Mengesโ strong cinematography, with its crisp textures and glassy colours, does a lot of the work in maintaining a semblance of cohesion. The shame of
is that it constantly suggests the better movie it might have been with more courage and originality.