n
n
n
nDirectors: Mark Neveldine, Brian Taylor
n
n
n
nCast: Nicholas Cage, Idris Elba, Johnny Whitworth, Christopher Lambert, Ciaran Hinds
n
n
n
nReview:
n
n
n
nThere are movies out there that you donโt watch for their depth, or their themes, but for their fun factor. These are movies where I donโt expect any break through anything, in fact, what I expect from films such as Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance is fun, pure and simple and on that department I think this sequel to Ghost Rider (2007) delivered in spades. Just donโt bother watching it in 3-D because it was non existent. This is one of those movies that was converted to 3-D after the fact, and most of the time that doesnโt work out right, but the movie itself? Not a bad time at the movies. Itโs not Shakespeare, but then again, it was never trying to be. In fact, itโs quite obvious that the films team of directors Neveldine/Taylor, the directors behind the highly energetic Crank (2006) and Crank: High Voltage (2009), were damn certain of the kind of cheese ball b-movie that they were making, so they just ran with it. The result was a step up from the first film, which was a disaster in the first place.
n
n
n
n
n
n
nTo me Mark Steve Johnsonโs Ghost Rider (2007) was a crap fest of gargantuan proportions. It had a scene or two in there that were worth watching, but the film as a whole just didnโt work for me. Fast forward five years and now Marvel has decided to make this sequel in an effort to erase the previous film from peopleโs minds. The problem is that this isnโt going to happen because this sequel still stars Nicholas Cage, and that alone will remind people of the first film. But whatever, the important thing to remember is that this is a whole new creative team handling the character and that alone should insure us something different. As a result, this film does have more of an edge to it simply because itโs the Crank guys behind it.
n
n
n
n
n
n
nUnfortunately, even though we have a new duo of directors behind it, the films script is incredibly redundant; youโve seen this same plot unfold a billion times before which is really the films major fault. The plot is weak; it brings nothing new to the table in terms of story. Actually, Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance has the same exact plot from Drive Angry (2011) which Nicholas Cage himself starred in a mere year ago. I mean, come one, how many times have we seen a movie that is about a child who is prophesized to be the antichrist? Way too many times thatโs how many! Truth is that Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance is in the same exact category as Drive Angry. This sequel is a silly fun time, an unapologetic b-movie. Itโs not half as bad as DriveAngry, a film I loved to hate. To me, Drive Angry was a train wreck, but it was a fun one to watch. Ghost Rider Spirit of Vengeance isnโt as bad as Drive Angry was, but itโs definitely in the same freaking ball park. Bottom line is that with films that use repetitive story lines, the rule of thumb is: itโs not what you say, but how you say it. And I loved the style and energy that the duo of directors infused this new film with.
n
n
n
n
n
n
nAfter all, Neveldine and Taylor are known for their hyperkinetic action films; and this is where Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance got things right in my book. The action sequences where awesome, thereโs some great photography on this one as well. I saw this little video clip that showed how Neveldine and Taylor shot some of these scenes and you can tell these guys where really gung ho about getting the most energetic shots, the most original anglesโฆI mean, these guys shot parts of this film on skateboards and in line skates! They even shot scenes while hanging from a helicopter! So I applaud these guys for making films with so much passion and energy, it translates well into their films; you feel the camera so close to the action, you feel the action in your face.
n
n
n
n
n
n
nThe Ghost Rider himself looks awesome; this is the best the character has looked to date. He looks slightly more satanic, more evil. The Riderโs burning skull makes his leather jacket sizzle and pop as it blazes on; the skull looks black, he simply looks kick assโฆwhich kind of clashes with the way Cage plays him when he isnโt the rider. Cage portrays old flame head with his trademark goofiness and on this film he went over board with it; Cageโs trademark looniness is in full throttle on this one. This I really enjoyed. I donโt know about you guys, but I like it when Cage goes on one of those crazy rampages of fury. On this film Johnny Blaze is drunk and high during most of the film, a trademark of Neveldine and Taylors films; their characters are always abusing drugs and booze. In some scenes Johnny Blaze acts as if heโs coked up out of his mind or something! Thereโs this one hilarious scene where Cage is trying to hold his transformation into the Ghost Riderโฆfunny stuff! Iโm actually glad they decided to go with this sense of humor; it fits well with the whole b-movie side of things. Itโs like the filmmakers know nobody is taking this film too seriously, so they just decided to have some fun with it; which they did, I mean, we get to see Ghost Rider pissing fire!
n
n
n
n
n
n
nThe film does manage to squeeze in an original idea or two in there. For example, I loved how they played around with the idea that whatever vehicle the Ghost Rider rides turns fiery and demonic. Itโs not just his bike this time around; the Rider rides a couple of different vehicles, this offers us the most original visuals in the film. I had tons of fun with this one even though I found the story to be so lazy, I mean, come one, really another crazy satanic cult that wants to sacrifice a child to Satan? Come on, weโve seen that way too many times. But I was having fun with everything else in the film, Ghost Rider looks awesome, Cage was funny and crazy (the way I like him!) and the action from Neveldine and Taylor rocked; so what we got here ladies and gentlemen is a fun time at the movies. Nothing ground breaking, but nothing boring either. At the very least itโs worth a watch.
n
n
n