Nazi Policies Inspired This Movie: See How Dr. Ehrlich Fought Back!
Key points
Dr. Ehrlich’s Magic Bullet (1940) Summary
“Dr. Ehrlich’s Magic Bullet” (1940), directed by William Dieterle, is a compelling biographical drama that chronicles the life and achievements of Dr. Paul Ehrlich. The film showcases Ehrlich’s groundbreaking work in immunology and his relentless pursuit of scientific discovery despite the challenges posed by anti-Semitism and professional jealousy.
Cast
- Edward G. Robinson as Dr. Paul Ehrlich
- Ruth Gordon as Hedwig Ehrlich
- Otto Kruger as Emil von Behring
- Donald Crisp as Dr. Robert Koch
- Maria Ouspenskaya as Frau Speyer
Review
Inspired by the Nazi regime’s dismissal of Jewish scientific contributions, producer Hal Wallis chose to highlight Dr. Paul Ehrlich’s remarkable legacy. Set in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the film follows Ehrlich’s pioneering efforts in developing “magic bullets” – treatments that target diseases without harming the body. This journey begins with his work on diphtheria alongside Emil Behring in 1894 and culminates in his revolutionary treatment for syphilis.
John Huston’s screenplay, co-written with Heinz Herald and Norman Burnside, received an Oscar nomination for its eloquent depiction of Ehrlich’s scientific endeavors. Edward G. Robinson, stepping away from his usual gangster roles, delivers a nuanced performance as Ehrlich, a curious and dedicated scientist often at odds with the established medical community due to his Jewish heritage and innovative methods.
The film opens with Ehrlich as a medical school student, marginalized by senior staff for his curiosity and extensive lab work. His breakthrough comes when he develops a staining technique that allows for better visualization of cells under a microscope. This leads to significant advancements in diagnosing tuberculosis and other diseases. However, his relentless pursuit of knowledge results in Ehrlich contracting tuberculosis, prompting a recovery trip to Egypt with his wife, played by Ruth Gordon. Here, he learns about the immune system and begins work on a diphtheria vaccine.
Ehrlich’s work is hailed internationally, but his own countrymen remain skeptical. The film draws a parallel between scientific and political resistance, highlighting the professional jealousy and prejudice Ehrlich faced. These themes resonate with the film’s 1940s audience, subtly critiquing the Nazi regime’s anti-Semitic policies.
Dieterle’s direction brings a sense of authenticity to the film, with a cast of talented character actors supporting Robinson’s standout performance. The script does not overly simplify scientific concepts, maintaining a balance between accessibility and intellectual depth. The film addresses relevant topics such as scientific prejudice and the ethical clashes between social, medical, institutional, and personal beliefs.
“Dr. Ehrlich’s Magic Bullet” stands alongside other biographical films of its era, like “The Story of Louis Pasteur” and “Madame Curie,” following familiar plot arcs of brave scientists overcoming bogus villains. Yet, it distinguishes itself with its subtle critique of contemporary political issues and its celebration of scientific progress.
in Conclusion “Dr. Ehrlich’s Magic Bullet” is a testament to the power of perseverance and the importance of scientific inquiry. With strong performances, a thoughtful script, and deft direction, the film remains a poignant reminder of the enduring fight against prejudice and the quest for knowledge. It serves as both an inspiring biographical drama and a historical critique, making it a significant and relevant piece of cinema.
